An investigator is confronted with a life-threatening situation that necessitates using a test article in a human subject who is unable to provide informed consent and there is no time to obtain consent for the individual's legal representative. Under the FDA regulations, describes the best course of action for the investigator.

The  Institutional Review Board will be notified later.

Explanation:

The objective of informed consent provides sufficient information to a potential subject and enables that individual to make an informed choice about involvement in research. When both the investigator and an independent practitioner confirm the condition entails the application of the test article. In such circumstances, an exception can be made for informed consent under the  Food and Drug Administration regulations.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

step 1. boil eggs

step 2.eat eggs

step 3. get your hot poonts ready