Jack, a second-hand dealer of cars, provides his clients with the opportunity to examine them. Jenny test-drove a car and got it checked by her mechanic as well. However, the mechanic missed a broken valve and the car broke down after the purchase. Which of the following is likely to happen in this scenario? A) Jack is exempt from prosecution as the principle of caveat emptor applies.
B) Jack is responsible for selling a faulty car and can be prosecuted for fraud.
C) Jenny can claim compensation through courts as per the principle of caveat emptor.
D) Jack can be prosecuted by the mechanic for misleading him during purchase.

Germany's black forest is being destroyed as a result of which environmental issue ?

Why do you think that historians use the word “revolution” to describe important changes in agriculture? how did the green revolution and other agricultural revolutions change the lives of billions of people? < < read less

An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank.however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day.b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual.c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it.d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.