When justices on the Supreme Court discover conflicts in the reasoning that supports their decisions, they must sometimes a. Use neither reason. b. Draft a new reason to support their decision. c. Use both reasons. d. Choose one rationale over another.

d. Choose one rationale over another.

Explanation:

Due to the fact that, judicial decisions are also affected by various internal and external factors, such as legal, personal, ideological, and political influences. In order to make what appears to be non-bias decision, Supreme Court rulings have to keep up with the changing times.

Hence, when justices on the Supreme Court discover conflicts in the reasoning that supports their decisions, they must sometimes "choose one rationale over another." That is, they must sometimes choose reason they believe is more logical and understanding, and support their decision better.

it should be c, women were allowed to vote in all states because federal law supersedes state law.

"states can make their own laws, as long as they don't contradict what the federal law states. the states do not have the authority to pass a law that negates a federal law." -google