Which of the following is a reason the Supreme Court was asked to rule on various provisions and interpretations of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002? 1. Lagalizad political advertisement for the year leaading upto an election.
2. Conflicts with the free speech provision of the U. S constitution allowed individauals to make unlimited political donations.
3. Allowed foreign corporations to make unlimited political donations.

Conflicts with the free speech provision of the U.S constitution allowed individuals to make unlimited political donations ( 2 )

Explanation:

The main reason the supreme court  was asked  to rule on various provisions and interpretations of the Bipartisan campaign Reform act of 2002 is Conflicts with the free speech provision of the U.S constitution allowed individuals to make unlimited political donations

The Bipartisan campaign Reform act of 2002 was an act passed by the congress and this act was meant o address to major issues regarding the amount of money a political party can either get from different sources and also how much money they can spend during elections. The act was also meant to address issues surrounding the proliferation of issue of advocacy ads

it looks like its all of the above. [.wpal1kojopfdpojfrfionrnif.knfdsnksjosjo]

explanation:

you have to combine all of your answers together to

.wpal1kojopfdpojfrfionrnif.knfdsnksjosjo

answer; collective security;