Watch this video segment again more closely while considering the role of nature vs. nurture in the development of gender identity. was the traditional view of genderidentity a nature or nurture stance? where did dr. money's view of gender identitydevelopment fall on the nature vs. nurture scale? support your answers with details fromthe video.

Dr. Money's view of gender identity development falls on the nurture scale.

Explanation:

Traditional view of gender identify had a stance of nature. It was the biological factor that determined the identity of an individual according to traditional view.Dr. Money's view of gender identity development falls on the nurture scale.In his experiment we can understand that he tried to convince Joan/John for sex reassignment through numerous experiments of nurture such as by making him watch about male and female genitalia, spoke to him about women's biological features, suggesting him hormonal tablets, etc.It was all done in an attempt to convince him psychologically that he was a girl through the process of nurture.

During the paleolithic, hominins grouped together in small societies such as bands, and subsisted by gathering  plants  and fishing, hunting or scavenging wild  animals. the paleolithic is characterized by the use of knapped stone tools, although at the time humans also used  wood  and bone tools.