The chart compares prospective voter support leading up to the 2012 presidential election.

A 3 column table with 2 rows titled Voter support by gender, October 2012. Column 1 is labeled Gender with entries Men, Women. Column 2 is labeled percent supporting Obama with entries 42, 52. Column 3 is labeled percent supporting Romney with entries 52, 43.

This chart demonstrates that

more men were likely to be liberal voters.
more men were likely to be progressive voters.
more men were likely to be Democratic voters.
more men were likely to be conservative voters.

More men were likely to be conservative voters.

Option D.

Explanation:

In the table given in the question, it has been shown that in the year 2012 in the month October, the percentage of men who voted for Romney (which was 52%) were more than the percentage of men who voted for Obama (which was 42%).

This meant that the people in the United States of America were more likely conservative voters. The reason for this was that Romney was a strong conservative follower and was a republican. So the people supporting him were also conservative voters.

it depends on which society you are referring to. many civilization performed rituals so the gods would with their growing season but the most well known is that of the aztecs. they would make sacrifices, usually animals, but sometimes humans as well.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals