What the Tudor achievements? pls help me

They are famous for many things, including the Henry VIII and his six wives, the exploration of America and the plays of William Shakespeare. During the sixteenth century, England emerged from the medieval world. It was a time of great change, most notably it marked the end of the Catholic church in England.

Here's somethings one of them did.

Henry VII finally ended England’s most destructive civil war, the Wars of the Roses, and brought peace and stability (at the cost of a rapacious and corrupt secret state).

Henry VIII brought Wales into full union with England, ending its status as an occupied territory.

Surprisingly for someone often considered an absolute monarch, Henry VIII oversaw a big increase in the prestige and power of Parliament, especially the House of Commons. This was because he could get the Commons to side with him against more conservative elements and the old nobility, and needed a new source of authority, since he was rejecting the Pope’s and the Church’s.

Starting under Henry VIII, but mainly under Elizabeth, they oversaw the early stages of England’s rise as a naval power.

Henry VII’s dynastic policy led to the union of crowns between England and Scotland.

Explanation:

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: