1. Because individual researchers are often preoccupied with doing the research and completing grant requirements, it is up to the Research Integrity Officer of the institution to know the rules regarding responsible research, and to guard against the violations of an individual. A. True B. False 2. The Research Integrity Officer of the institution should provide information so that employees, students, and volunteers know the channels for reporting suspected misconduct in research. A. True B. False 3. An allegation of misconduct is any written or oral statement made by one or more complainants to an institutional official that indicates possible misconduct by one or more respondents. However, such allegations must always include the identity of the complainant. A. True B. False 4. Because of the potential for retaliation to complainants and for the reputations to be harmed by mistaken allegations of the respondents, research institutions are responsible for making sure that whistleblowers are protected. A. True B. False

Because individual researchers are often preoccupied with doing the research and completing grant requirements, it is up to the Research Integrity Officer of the institution to know the rules regarding responsible research, and to guard against the violations of an individual.

B. False. It is also expected that the individual researchers also know the rules regarding responsible research. Such rules like avoiding plagarism is important.

The Research Integrity Officer of the institution should provide information so that employees, students, and volunteers know the channels for reporting suspected misconduct in research.

A. True. This help the people in knowing the appropriate channels to send their complaints to.

An allegation of misconduct is any written or oral statement made by one or more complainants to an institutional official that indicates possible misconduct by one or more respondents. However, such allegations must always include the identity of the complainant.

B. False. It must not always include the identity of the complainant. This is done inorder to avoid victimization of the complainant by the other employee in higher job hierarchy.

Because of the potential for retaliation to complainants and for the reputations to be harmed by mistaken allegations of the respondents, research institutions are responsible for making sure that whistleblowers are protected

A. True. This would help in assuring other potential complainant that their identity would always be protected and their safety never japodised.

Explanation:

the most likely outcome of fewer loon territories is that hawks would increase in proportion because the benefit of victory would be greater. hawks and loons are natural rivals of resources and victories in the game, since the lakes drying up affected the loons, the hawks would be benefited from the drought.

dude you should crop your image so only the question shows. but   can you explain it better