How can you, as a counselor, avoid becoming "stuck" in a particular theoretical framework? Identify specific ways that you can ensure you continue to grow. What are some trends you are interested in learning about now that you understand counseling theory?

Although this is a personal question that only you can answer, I can provide an example that can give you some guidance for performing your own work.

Often, when professionals learn about the different frameworks and perspectives from which they can understand their subjects, they get "stuck" into a framework that they find most convenient or useful. However, this can be detrimental to their development, as it prevents them from seeing a problem from all its angles.

A way in which you can avoid getting "stuck" in a particular framework would be constantly reminding yourself that other perspectives are available. You could also try to see the same problem through the eyes of these different perspectives.

A trend that I would be interested in learning about would be multicultural counseling. I believe that, as we live in a globalized world, this is an approach that is becoming more relevant than ever. It is also an approach that would give me the opportunity to understand the world from the perspective of many different cultures.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

answer; i believe the correct answer is (general);