Sole proprietors often cannot offer fringe benefits to workers. Explain why this could be a disadvantage to the owner of a sole proprietorship.

less ability to attract required talents as well as retain existing ones.

Explanation: A Sole proprietorship is a business which belongs to only one owner, often not Incorporated and has thesame identity as the owner as he or she goes home with the profit after tax and bear all lost or liability. This business is usually small, easy to startup as well as dissolve as their is no government intervention.

The sole proprietor often cannot offer fringe benefits ( additional benefits offered to employees outside salary or wages) because the business is small and he or she can't afford or bear the cost.

This could be a disadvantage because;

He or She might loss the ability to attract talented employees that may boost the company's image as well as increase general work output as they may be easily enticed by other companies (big companies) with fringe benefits.

The sole proprietor might also loss the the ability to retain his or her talented workers as they also may look elsewhere i.e look to work for companies with better fringe benefits.

The sole proprietor might be pushed into regularly increasing worker's wages or salaries to retain them when a fringe benefit will have sufficed.

becoming the top african american female attorny and motivational speaker in opelika al 36801

explanation:

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.