Each week, Wellspring Waters incurs total costs of $38,500 to filter natural spring water. The firm can then bottle the water as is, or it can spend $4,600 to add flavorings prior to bottling. Weekly revenue for plain water would be $92,700, while weekly revenue for the flavored water would be $100,800. Wellspring has just learned that the cost of filtering the spring water will decrease by $1,000 in the week ahead, but the cost of flavorings will increase by $1,200. Given these changes, which of the following statements is accurate A Wellspring should produce flavored water this week and plain water next week. B Wellspring should produce plain water this week and flavored water next week. C Wellspring should produce flavored water both this week and next. D Wellspring should produce plain water both this week and next.

C

Wellspring should produce flavored water both this week and next.

Explanation: Given that

The total costs to filter natural spring water = $38500

With Weekly revenue for plain water = $92,700

Gain = 92700 - 38500 = $54200

While

The cost of flavorings bottling = $38500 + $4600 = $43100

With Weekly revenue for the flavored water = $100,800

Gain = 100800 - 43100 = $57700

If the cost of filtering the spring water will decrease by $1,000 in the week ahead, then

Normal water gain = $44100

but the cost of flavorings will increase by $1,200.

Flavour water gain = 57700 - 1200

Flavour water gain = $56500

Since flavour water gain is more than normal water, we will conclude that Wellspring should produce flavored water both this week and next.

answer; i do believe that its(gestation,suction-aspiration or vacuum aspiration;

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.