David, Sarah's supervisor in the workplace, invites her to dinner. Politely, Sarah tells David that she would rather not. David persists and asks her again, this time indicating that he finds her very "foxy." David implies that Sarah could be promoted if his wishes are satisfied. Sarah tells David that she does not want to go out with him. David persists, asking Sarah several times a day to go out with him and revealing his sexual attraction toward her. He implies that she may not be promoted. According to federal statutes and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sarah appears to be the victim of

Victim of quid pro quo harassment.

Explanation:

QUID PRO QUO HARASSMENT occurs in the workplace when a manager or other authority figure like the supervisors offers or merely hints that he or she will give the employee something (a raise or a promotion) in return for that employee's satisfaction of a sexual demand. This also occurs when a manager or other authority figure says he or she will not fire or reprimand an employee in exchange for some type of sexual favor.

For instance, a male bank manager interviewing a female applicant for a job as a teller places his hand on her thigh. When she objects, he asks, "Don't you want this job?" The implication is that she must comply with the hiring manager's advances in order to get hired just as in the case of Sarah which involved David her supervisor promising her a raise, or a promotion in exchange for a sexual demand.

it all depends on how long the hours are. i think they wouldn't approve of it. in my opinion.