Adam is injured in a motorcycle accident and files suit against Brenda, whom Adam alleges was driving negligently. Brenda claims that Adam was driving more carelessly than she was. Comparative negligence may reduce Adam's recovery

I assume you're asking the question, true or false?

True

Explanation:

Comparative negligence lies on the legal theory that's one's negligence during an accident may hold that person partly responsible for injuries because he was partly responsible for the accident. There is the 51% rule in some states in the US whereby you can collect compensation if the motorcyclist(brenda here) is more than half at fault in the accident. Compensation to Adam is therefore reduced by the percentage of fault he has in the accident.

answer; under developed;