Since the lawyers start the case with the opening statement, what is the primary reason they review the facts in the summation at the end? (Select all that apply.) Because they need to remind the jury of the important facts. Because the jury might not remember the opening statement. Because the opening statement cannot include opinion. Because they need to refute each other’s case.

What would be the most relevant question to ask to find out why tutankhamen died? what was tutankhamen’s age when he died? was a doctor with tutankhamen at his death? why was tutankhamen mummified after his death? did tutankhamen’s body have evidence of disease?

Why is the netherlands vulnerable to changes in climate? a. the netherlands is against nuclear power. b. forests in the netherlands have been destroyed by acid rain. c. the netherlands wrote the kyoto protocols. d. the netherlands is low-lying country, and rising sea levels may cause flooding.

The year is 1776. the family of philosopher john locke has brought a lawsuit against thomas jefferson for copying locke's ideas. locke's family claim that jefferson's "declaration of independence" plagiarizes locke's ideas from two treatises on government. you are the judge ruling on the case. you must research how jefferson's ideas compare to locke's and determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of stealing locke's ideas. your paragraph opinion (a court document explaining how you arrived at your decision on a case) should contain the following: explain at least 2 ideas of jefferson and locke that are similar explain at least 1 idea of jefferson that is different from locke's determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of plagiarism explain why or why not ~~ you don't have to do the work for me but i really would like some with this, you ! ( if you would like to do it for me that's great too : )