If you blame poor people for their poverty and ignore situational factors that impact them, such as high unemployment rates, recession, poor educational opportunities, and poor social mobility / the familial cycle of poverty because you feel people get the outcomes in life they deserve, you believe in the .

Just world hypothesis

Explanation:

The JUST WORLD HYPOTHESIS is the cognitive bias or assumption that a person's actions are basically likely to bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, to the end of all good actions being eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished.

The just-world phenomenon is the tendency to believe that the world is just and that people get what they deserve. Because people want to believe that the world is fair, they will look for ways to explain or rationalize away injustice, often blaming the person in a situation who is actually the victim.

The JUST WORLD PHENOMENON helps explain why people sometimes blame victims for their own misfortune, even in situations where people had no control over the events that have befallen them.

It is also a belief that people get the outcomes in life they deserve. For instance, if you want to experience positive outcomes, you just need to work hard to get ahead in life. One negative consequence is people's tendency to blame poor individuals for their plight. Blaming poor people for their poverty ignores situational factors that impact them, such as high unemployment rates, recession, poor educational opportunities, and the familial cycle of poverty.

well it depends i think people around the world are coming around to gay marriage. but if you are talking abortion then wow, so much to talk about. such as men thinking they have the right to choose if women can, the fact there are health concerns if the women can't get one, and many more arguments to discuss. so i would definitely say abortion would be a much more interesting topic.

answer; the rudder on ship ;