subject
Social Studies, 14.04.2020 20:11 Playboycxm

Which three things did ancient Greece contribute to European culture?

medicine
agriculture
government
science
philosophy
arts
PLZ PLZ HELP

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
How important is it to have a powerful army and navy? give two reasons for your answer
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30
Give a brief summary/define the holocaust - who was behind it, how it began, what was the goal, and where did it take place? (8-10 sentences). be sure to include at least 2 pictures or a timeline
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30
Banks offer services such as checking and savings accounts. what do banks do with most of the money they receive in deposits from customers? a) they loan it out to other customers. b) they spend it on new banks in other places. c) they keep it in a locked, secured vault in the bank. d) they send it to the federal reserve in washington, d.c.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which three things did ancient Greece contribute to European culture?

medicine
agr...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 13.04.2020 19:00
Questions on the website: 13722360