WIL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP Analyze the map below and answer the question that follows.

A natural resource map of Australia. A key notes Coal, Bauxite, Gold, and Geothermal energy. Coal is in the southeast and Tasmania. Bauxite is along the northern and southwest coastlines. Gold is along the southeast coastline and sparingly along the coastline in other regions. Geothermal energy is in Central Australia and along the northeast and western coastlines.
Images by Spebi, hrum, egore911, and AX11

Closely examine the map above. Why is this resource map inaccurate?

A. Coal is not common in Australia, so it should not be on this map.
B. Bauxite is not common in Australia, so it should not be on this map.
C. Gold is not common in Australia, so it should not be on this map.
D. Geothermal energy is not common in Australia, so it should not be on this map.

Please select the best answer from the choices provided

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

i truly dont know the answer wait i do its 1,3,4

elastic potential energy

protectionism fosters competition and keeps price regulated is not an argument in favor of protectionism.