Detail: A project whose positive
exceed its
is more likely
to be enacted that one that is the opposite

We are being asked to confirm the trueness of the statement made above. It is indeed true that a project whose positive exceeds its negative is more likely to be enacted than one that is the opposite.

Learn more here:

link

A project whose positive  exceed its negative attributes is more likely  to be enacted that one that is the opposite

Explanation:

One can find this postulated statement to be true for most things and has well applied for the blanket word of a project.

The task assessment and the numeration of what is good and what is not in a single project for the company ultimately comes from this fact only.

The attributes of positive and negative are the ultimate backbone of sch assessments.

So a positive is anything that gives gains to the company or the firm or the person while the negative is what harms them in a way.

If it does more good than harm then it is good to go.

d

explanation:

it establishes america’s basic laws and fundamentals to its citizens.

they produces sugar..

hope this , question was a little open ended