According to Follett, in , neither side gets exactly everything it wants, and the best each side can do is obtain a result that each can agree too. compromise integration dominance avoidance accommodating

Compromise

Explanation:

Compromise is defined as an agreement, usually when settling a dispute, reached by each side making concessions. According to Mary Parker Follett, in compromise, both parties do not necessarily get what they want, and hence they come to a concession, which is usually the best that each of them can have at that point in time.

Compromise

Explanation: Compromise is just that, when both sides have to give a little to both get what they want. In the long run both parties may have had to sacrifice, but both are satisfied.

dude you should crop your image so only the question shows. but   can you explain it better

the earthquake in haiti was a magnitude of 7.0 according to the u.s geological survey yet the smaller earthquake in haiti killed more than 200,000 and left more than 1.2 million people homeless. the chile earthquake was a magnitude of 8.8 and 500 times more stronger but chile's earthquake only injured 712 people.