Raul agrees to ship to Ben one hundred ceiling fans for $5,000. Raul initials his notes of the deal, which include the terms, and sends a copy to Ben. Ben initials his own notes of the deal, which include the terms, and sends a copy to Raul. Raul fails to ship the fans. Against Raul, as a contract, the deal is

a. not enforceable.
b. enforceable, because Ben's initialed notes are a sufficient writing.
c. enforceable, because Raul's initialed notes are a sufficient writing.
d. enforceable, because under the UCC a contract need not be written.

c. enforceable, because Raul's initialed notes are a sufficient writing.

Explanation:

Since Raul has Raul initialed his notes of the deal, which include the terms, and sends a copy to Ben. This shows that, Raul has agreed to the contract.

To initialed a note means to sign or authorized a note; which is the copy of the agreement to the contract.

Hence, It is enforceable because duty of the contract which is often times written (verbal agreements are sometimes enforceable as well) is what makes a contract to be legally binding, and in it, is the obligations expected of the parties to a contract.

sorry but your romanian isn't clear could you just translate to english

explanation:

well considering i can't see the graph, it's probably prices