Social Studies, 07.04.2020 20:09 kcruz87

In , individuals agree reluctantly with a group's decision because they are more concerned about maintaining harmony and cohesiveness than critically thinking about problems or alternative approaches.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:10

What new form of music swept the nation in the 1950s a. chamber music b. hip-hop c. jazz d. rock-and-roll

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:00

Choose the best example of an indirect confrontation for the following situation: peter, a local school board member hired john whom owns a local print shop to make custom t-shirts for his son's basketball team, the ravens. they are about to play their final game of the year and are having a party to celebrate their semi-finalist rankings. unfortunately, the printer made a mistake and printed on red/blue shirts instead of black/blue which are the team's actual colors. peter explains to john that the team's colors are black/blue instead of red/blue and asks john what he thinks they should do. peter explains to john that the team's colors are black/blue and demands that john re-print the shirts on the correct colors. peter agrees to take the red/blue shirts but then posts a negative yelp review on john's business. peter agrees to take the red/blue shirts but tells everyone he can in the school about the incident and tells them not to buy from john. peter rejects the shirts and files a lawsuit to attempt to recover the down payment he made to john.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:20

Which of the following is a major difference between appellate courts and courts of first instance? a. appellate courts do not use a jury, only judges.courts of first instance hold appellate jurisdiction exclusively.c. courts of first instance do not use judges and appellate courts do.d. appellate courts hear all criminal and civil cases and courts of first instance do not.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

In , individuals agree reluctantly with a group's decision because they are more concerned about mai...

Questions