KILL:WRITING A SUMMARY
Use the paragraphs below to answer the following questions.

Strong cultural differences existed between the British colonies and the Boer republics. For example, in Cape Colony all people who had a certain level of wealth, regardless of race, were allowed to vote for representatives to the colony’s parliament. In the Boer republics, only white people were recognized as citizens, and only white men could vote.

The discovery of diamonds in 1868 and gold in 1886 in the Boer republics renewed British interest in uniting these lands under British rule. They made a claim on these lands at the Berlin Conference in 1884 and began working to establish authority over the Boers. During a bitter, two-year war that began in 1899, the British army defeated the Boer settlers and gained control of all of South Africa.

What was the result of the events?

Which of the following statements concerning brazil since independence is not true? brazilians today can participate in politics through voting. brazil has been governed by dictators and elected officials. brazil became independent from portugal in 1822. brazil was the first country in the americas to end slavery.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

How does sociology account for the cause of drug and alcohol addiction?