In what ways do appeals and arguments align with feelings and thinking? Group of answer choices Appeals inspire feelings: arguments inspire thinking. Appeals inspire thinking: arguments inspire feelings. Feelings inspire appeals; thinking inspires arguments. Feelings inspire arguments; thinking inspires appeals.

Appeals inspire feelings, arguments inspire thinking

Explanation:

Appeals can be explained or described simply as a process or a way of correcting errors. This involves the process of addressing a doing or an act which an individual does not like. This is usually done in a polite manner.

Argument can be explained as a situation of showing reasons of supporting or coming against a particular decision or an idea.

In this case, Appeal usually inspire the feelings, that is , it is done most times based on the feelings an individual has towards the thing, or person, while argument inspire thinking. This is because , you have to set of points and be able to present them convincinly as to why you are against or in support of an idea or decision.

answer; the mercertator creation, is the correct answer to the above question; ///good luck

an informal structure in a bureaucracy would be something like so-called "office politics". where there's a formal structure set up for the organization, but then an informal subculture as well that has a way of organizing the bureaucracy further. this can be positive because it sets up an added degree of organization, albeit informal, within the bureaucracy.