Social Studies, 18.09.2019 12:30 jaquezdaking4919

Choose one of the following cases: mcculloch v. maryland, gibbons v. ogden, or district of columbia v. heller. in at least two well-written paragraphs, explain why the case is important to understanding the changing nature of american federalism.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: DivineMemes420

District of Columbia versus Heller

Further Explanation:

Heller VS District of Columbia case 570 of 2008 was an important case of the U.S.A that took under arrest the “Second Amendment” that protected a person from having arms in spite of being free and independent with ‘any military service’.

The ruling allowed the citizens of the country to keep arms as per ‘lawful purpose’ and for ‘self-defense’ and also declared that the ‘right to bear arms’ was limited and its ‘ownership’ will be regulated. It was the first example when the Supreme Court took the decision that whether the ‘Second Amendment’ is protecting the ‘rights of the people or not’.

District of Columbia versus Heller case got formulated in the ‘Suit filed’ in the ‘district law court’ of the United States in the year 2003. It was included in the case District of Columbia versus Parker filed against the “Firearms Control Regulation act (1975)”. The act prohibited the conducting of ‘unlicensed guns’ and other ‘deadly weapons’. The Supreme Court heard its ‘oral argument’ on 18th March 2008 and gave ruling two months later on July 26 approving the people citizen’s rights.

Learn More:

1. In a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. Is elected by representatives chosen by the people. Is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament? Is elected directly by the people.

2. The most influential and powerful members of a political party are most likely found

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Heller Versus District of Columbia

Subject: Social Studies

Keywords: district, arrest, second amendment, independent, military service, self-defense, ownership, Supreme Court, district law court

Answer from: NathanMoreno2019

McCulloch vs. Maryland: "The power to tax equals the power to destroy" -- The state of Maryland attempted to tax the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States (federally-created) -- Confirmed the legitimacy (in Marshall's opinion) of the Bank of the United States, thus upholding Congress' use of the elastic clause. Also further emphasized Article VI (Supremacy Clause) that the states had no power to tax a federal institution. Clearly defining that federal law/power trumps state. Gibbons vs. Ogden: Federally issued permit vs. State (NY) issued permit to navigate waterways around New York. Marshall court re-emphasized Article VI (Supremacy) stating that federal law trumps state AND this decision further emphasized the Commerce Clause stating that commerce was not defined solely as the buying and selling of goods, but the transportation thereof as well.

Establishing that only the national Congress had the ability to regulate INTERstate trade, further strengthening the federal government over the states. D.C. vs. Heller: Difficult to answer this properly as the District of Columbia is not a "state." A better case would be McDonald vs. Chicago, but anyway: DC placed a ban on handguns, a security guard who possessed a firearm on the job, brought the weapon home in violation of D.C. law. First major 2nd Amendment case since U.S. v. Miller (1939) which allowed SOME regulation of firearms. Decision: the 2nd Amendment protects a citizen's right to bear arms. The D.C. ban on firearms was unconstitutional. Along with the McDonald decision, this "incorporated" the 2nd Amendment as a right that must be protected by the states. All of the above cases affect the nature of federalism in essence by reducing the rights/powers (10th) of the states and strengthening the powers/roles of the federal government. In terms of which case you use, pick your poison.

Answer from: Quest

Is there a picture that goes with this question?

Answer from: Quest

answer; /// working class;

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:20

State law requires you to inform the secretary of state''s office of an address change within days.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30

8. select a supreme court case that has been particularly important in protecting civil liberties in the united states. in a three-paragraph essay, describe the case and the ruling, then explain how the case demonstrates why it is important that the supreme court is: a. protected from political or public pressure (since justices are appointed rather than elected and serve lifetime terms) b. able to change its interpretations of the law over time (10 points)

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 18:30

Put these events in the correct order #1-4. cause: world war 1 caused heavy casualties and property damage throughout europe. many people barely had enough food to eat or coal to stay warm. what happened next? question 1 options: russia, now led by lenin, became the first communist nation in history. communism soon spread to many small countries near russia, and eventually spread to cuba, china, and vietnam. led by vladimir lenin, a group called the bolshevik party gained the support of the people and overthrew russia’s monarchy, killing czar nicholas ii and his family. russian citizens, who were starving and poor, became angry at the ruling class who held all of the nation’s wealth. (write them in order of which they happened)

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 22:40

What are ways the president interacts with forgein country's

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Choose one of the following cases: mcculloch v. maryland, gibbons v. ogden, or district of columbia...

Questions