Ms. Castella uses portfolio assessment in language arts. Students collect their best work throughout the year and review their portfolios at the end of each grading period. Ms. Castella instructs students to look for ways their writing has improved each grading period by comparing their recent best work to previous work. What aspect of the TARGET model is she using to increase student motivation to learn?

Recognition.

Explanation:

The TARGET model of motivation was developed by Carole Ames. The model is a helpful guide and framework for teachers to help their children build motivation through instructions.

The word TARGET is an acronym for Task, Authority, Recognition, Grouping, Evaluation, and Time.

In the given case, Ms. Castella has used the aspect of Recognition.

According to the aspect of recognition, the teacher can motivate his/her students by helping them to recognise their achievements.

In the given case, Ms. Castella is helping her students to recognise their achievements by comparing their past best work with the recent best work. When students will see improvement and achievement in their works they will feel motivated.

So, the correct answer is recognition.

answer; i believe its called ; checks   and balances;

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: