Curtis filed a lawsuit against Ulhoff for failure to repay $1,000 according to the terms of a promissory note. The trial ended before it began, with the trial judge granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of Curtis. Ulhoff has appealed, and the Supreme Court of Iowa has remanded the case. This means:

a. Curtis automatically wins because he won in the lower court.
b. Ulhoff automatically wins because he lost in the lower court.
c. Neither party wins because the case is being thrown out.
d. We don't know who wins yet because the case is being returned to the trial court for additional steps

Option D: we don't know who wins yet because the case is been returned to trial court for additional steps

Explanation: a person appeals for a case when the decision made by the court does not favour him. An appeal does not technically means the at the person will win the case at a higher court. It simply means that the higher court will look into the case again. Most appealed cases are looked into by the higher court. They help to detect if there were any errors that has be made by the lower court. They also help to ensure clarity and also interpret the law properly. In the court of law an appeal case taken to a higher court is looked into properly. Other steps are taken so as to give the right verdict.

fast by juice wrld

explanation:

would it be plagiarism to copy and paste off of here? ?