The myth of objectivity a) states all myths can be objectified by the people who adhere to them b) it is a myth that scientists (or any human) can be completely objective in their research and analysis c) is a myth itself, objectivity can always be achieved with the proper scientific training and will power

The myth of objectivity:

B) it is a myth that scientists (or any human) can be completely objective in their research and analysis

Explanation:

The myth of objectivity bases its posture in the fact that perspectives define the objectiveness of people, therefore it is biased and it can't be achieved following the deductive axioms of the Austrian economics positive schools that associates variables and deducts reason or reality based on the arguments that approach to the explanation of the phenomenon. It is debated because of people against positivism which s not optimism. (Its the most strict method and theory to obtain or generate knowledge) Believe that a researcher or human that bases his arguments in logic to associate different variables or elements will be driven by his or her convictions or objectives, therefore what I perceive as blue color is blue, but that it is based in the social construction of representations that is decided by authority and power in the background of the people doing the definition. However, they miss the part that from all perspectives in all languages, the phenomenon will have the same result. and they say that it is biased because we see what we want to see. Instead of seeing what is right there in nature itself. Because our human objectives define our view. And that because it is claused to absolutes of our perception and our methods, that there are unknown things we can't perceive and therefore we can't define reality. However, they miss the point of human science, which is trying to explain reality with what we have.

- "ethical issues. deception – the participants actually believed they were shocking a real person and were unaware the learner was a confederate of milgram's. however, milgram argued that “illusion is used when necessary in order to set the stage for the revelation of certain difficult-to-get-at-truths.” "

- "milgram's work was conducted in the early 1960s before the current.the studies ignited a debate about the ethical treatment of participants. what appear to be dangerous, if not deadly, electric shocks and the by today's ethical standards, many questions about the research have gone unanswered."

would it be plagiarism to copy and paste off of here? ?