Ryan and Hannah, both college students, are in a sexual relationship with each other and live together in a rented apartment. They share their expenses and split the rent. However, they do not intend to get married to one another in the future. Identify the living arrangement of Ryan and Hanna in this scenario.

Co-habitation relationship

Explanation:

Ryan and Hannah, both college students, are in a sexual relationship with each other and live together in a rented apartment. They share their expenses and split the rent. However, they do not intend to get married to one another in the future.The living arrangement of Ryan and Hanna in this scenario is a cohabitating arrangement

Cohabitation living arrangement in a relationship is an arrangement where two or more people are not married but live together probably living together as if married, usually without legal or religious sanction and  these individuals are often involved in a romantic or sexually intimate relationship, shares responsibility.

Cohabitation

Explanation:

Cohabitation is a type of living arrangement in which unmarried couples who are in a romantic relationship or have sexual intimacy with each other, dwell together in an apartment, while jointly sharing the bills. Most cohabitating couples who are unmarried, usually do not have the intention of getting married while most have taken this kind of arrangement as a replacement for marriage due to several reasons. Ryan and Hanna's living arrangement depicts cohabitation.

answer; i believe its (transgender);

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.