subject
Social Studies, 17.03.2020 20:24 justinchou814

Below are views for and against publicly funded elections.
It is unfair to force taxpayers
to pay for opinions they do
not support. Voters should be
able to express their opinions
by giving candidates as much
money as they want.
Candidates would spend less
time trying to raise money and
spend more time talking about
the issues. Some people can
afford to give more money to
candidates, which gives their
opinion an unfair advantage.
Which conclusion can be drawn from these views?
A. Running an election campaign takes many taxpayers.
B. Campaigning for elected office requires many opinions.
C. Campaigning for elected office takes a large amount of time.
D. Running an election campaign requires a large sum of money
ted Education Association, Inc. © 2015

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:20
Which of the following is not critical in decision making? a. taking action independentlyb. considering internal factorsc. considering external factorsd. considering decision consequences
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
On this map, the state of georgia is in which section of the map?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
Arecent challenge to the european union created by a member state is?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:00
Me fast do you think the outcome of this case would have been the same if president nixon hadclaimed national security needs rather than executive privilege? why or why not?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Below are views for and against publicly funded elections.
It is unfair to force taxpayers
Questions
question
Biology, 16.07.2019 05:10
Questions on the website: 13722367