How do the following main points for a speech about the achievements of Ida Wells-Barnett violate the guidelines presented in your textbook for organizing main points? I. As a teacher, Wells-Barnett spoke out against inferior school facilities for African-American children. II. As a journalist, Well-Barnett campaigned against lynching. III. In the early 20th century, Wells-Barnett expanded her activities. The main points should have been arranged in causal order. The main points don't each deal with a separate aspect of the topic. The main points don't divide the topic consistently. all of the above.

The main points should have been arranged in causal order and the main points don't divide the topic consistently.

Option: A and C

Explanation:

Main points for a speech about the achievements of Ida Wells-Barnett violate the guidelines presented in your textbook for organizing main points. Proper guidelines should be maintained and for that all the points should have been arranged in causal order and the main points don't divide the topic consistently.

According to the time of event or time occurrence achievement list would be prepared and point wise division should not split the consistency of the topic. If it is then the relevance would get disturbed.

okay? wahts the question

sir frederic attributed inaccuracies to schemas. memory reconstruction is one part actual events and one part personal schema, which can result in inaccuracies when memories are reconstructed.