As chief of new product development for a U. S. consumer goods firm, Carmen should be very aware that is likely to have the greatest influence on consumer preferences for the next few decades.

What is the difference between binding and non-binding arbitration? a. non-binding arbitration means that the arbitration hearing is not held in a court room. b. binding arbitration means that the parties have agreed they will not challenge in court the ruling from the arbitration c. binding arbitration exists only at the appellate level of the court system. d. non-binding arbitration occurs when the court does not have jurisdiction over one of the parties in the arbitration.what is the difference between binding and non-binding arbitration? a. non-binding arbitration means that the arbitration hearing is not held in a court room. b. binding arbitration means that the parties have agreed they will not challenge in court the ruling from the arbitration c. binding arbitration exists only at the appellate level of the court system. d. non-binding arbitration occurs when the court does not have jurisdiction over one of the parties in the arbitration.

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

What impact does geography have on where people live in brazil?