What has been the impact of social democracy on international business relations in some European countries? Politically conscious foreign firms have begun investing in socialist nations. Low income tax rates have encouraged an influx of FDI. Regulations have forced foreign firms to invest elsewhere. Political stability has decreased the country risk of socialist nations.

Regulations have forced foreign firms to invest elsewhere.

Explanation:

Social democracy is defined as a form of governing philosophy that supports social and economic interventions such as subsidies and the taxes, which helps to achieve a combination of a worthy democratic structure and that of capitalist mixed economy.

In trying to achieve or promotes a social justice within the context of a mixed socialism and capitalism in international business in some European countries, negative regulations such as heavy taxes to finance the economy, have forced foreign firms to invest elsewhere with favourable trade regulations.

Regulations have forced foreign firms to invest elsewhere.

Explanation:

Social democracy is a term used to describe a political consensus that determines that economic and social interventions are made within a country, with the main objective of promoting social justice within a capitalist system that allows the promotion of social well-being, of distribution of honesty and economic regulation.

Social democracy can interfere in several aspects of government, including in international trade relations, as was done in some European countries that determined regulations that obliged foreign companies to invest elsewhere.

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.