Constitutional scholars have pointed out there is an inconsistency in justice marshall’s opinion with respect to what the constitution specifically provides. What is that inconsistency?

The inconsistency is that constitution was not given the authority to issue a Writ.

Explanation: The constitution wasn't given the authority to issue a writ or a written command.

A Writ is the one fundamental right of supreme Court In common law, it is a formal written order issued by a body with administrative or judicial jurisdiction, usually a court.

The common types of writ are, prerogative writs, warrants and subpoenas among other forms of writs that are in existence or have existed before now.

do you have options to your question?

answer; ///attempts to change more than once behavior at the same time;