American courts often make decisions by relying on the principle of stare decisis, meaning that they use the legal precedents set by prior court decisions. With regard to protecting civil rights and civil liberties, why might this principle be a bad idea

The principle of stare decisis be a bad idea because if a major court decision undermines rights and liberties, then it might stand longer.

Explanation:

Stare decisis is a common principle followed in the legal system to determine points in lawsuit according to precedent.

According to stare decisis, the court follows the previous case judgment and follows it in a same way while handling similar cases. This shows that cases with similar facts or scenario are approached in the same way.

Courts decide to follow stare decisis as the solutions are already provided for the issues. The courts in America generally follow stare decisis principle to make decision.

european feudalism was a combination of legal and military customs in medieval europe that flourished between the 9th and 15th centuries. broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

japanese feudalism. the era of feudalism in japan took place from the 12th through 19th centuries. during that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence.