The proposal that we should discuss taxing high calorie, fat, or sugar foods to control obesity has.

a. thought to benefit the poor more than the well-to-do.
b. been rejected outright as having no possibility of decreasing obesity.
c. been viewed as a means of deterring unhealthy eating and raising money to combat obesity.
d. been adopted nationwide

c. been viewed as a means of deterring unhealthy eating and raising money to combat obesity.

Explanation:

The consumption of junk food deterrent in the form of modest tax on selected nutrients ,snack can yield high revenues for the government  but can slightly affect the obesity rates.Many people and studies indicate that high taxes can lead to decrease in obesity on a population level if combined with additional interventions e.g.,health education.

c. been viewed as a means of deterring unhealthy eating and raising money to combat obesity.

Explanation: The proposal that we should discuss taxing high calorie, fat, or sugar foods to control obesity has been viewed as a means of deterring unhealthy eating and raising money to combat obesity. This is one if the many ways where fiscal policy is used to influence food prices in ways that encourage healthy eating. The reasoning behind taxing junk foods is that by doing so, there would be a reduction in the consumption of foods that are linked to obesity while also discouraging unhealthy diets and offset the economic costs of obesity (from the tax returns).

by using  production possibilities graph.  opportunity costs are key expenses in financial matters and are utilized as a part of registering money saving advantage investigation of a venture. such expenses, be that as it may, are not recorded in the record books but rather are perceived in basic leadership by processing the money costs and their subsequent benefit or misfortune.