Sometimes when the state and federal governments have concurrent authority, the federal government can decide to regulate that area exclusively. In such a situation, the state law is unconstitutional according to the doctrine of federal subrogation.

Explanation:

Clause II of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution states that federal law is the "supreme law of the land." It implies that every judge of state and other courts must follow the federal laws of the Constitution.

This clause, often termed as Supremacy Clause, allow federal laws to preempt state laws, even when both the state and federal governments have concurrent authority over a particular subject.

The doctrine of federal preemption simply implies that higher court may arrogate the law of a lower court if the two authorities come into conflict.

i am not in high school so i don’t know

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.