subject
Social Studies, 04.03.2020 00:28 jrsecession

Because between-subjects experiments use a different group of participants for each treatment condition, one concern is that the participants in one treatment are noticeably different—for example, older, faster, or smarter—from the participants in another treatment. In the Katona experiment, how can the researcher be reasonably confident that the students in the understanding group were not considerably smarter than the students in the memorization group and that the difference in performance isn't simply caused by intelligence? The two groups were roughly equivalent when assigned to the two treatments. The same individuals participated in both treatment conditions.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:00
What were some of the things done to the colonists by king george iii?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30
What are some examples of native americans were impacted by colonization in america
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:50
11. what characteristic was shared by all the important scientists of the scientific revolution? the importance of challenging authority at all times in the pursuit of truth. truth is only achievable through a process of inquiry and observation. the belief that traditional methods of inquiry and discovery were correct, but needed greater accuracy. the belief that the ancient philosophers were correct in their original observations of the laws of nature.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:00
Why do you think americans were so fascinated by this idea of the united states stretching from “sea to sea”? give 2 reasons
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Because between-subjects experiments use a different group of participants for each treatment condit...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 16.04.2021 17:20
question
Mathematics, 16.04.2021 17:20
question
Computers and Technology, 16.04.2021 17:20
Questions on the website: 13722362