subject
Social Studies, 04.03.2020 00:16 wiltseliz4800

Psychopaths demonstrate normal appraisal of emotional cues and situations in the abstract (i. e., verbal discussion), but they are deficient in using emotional cues to guide their judgments and behavior in the process of living. This phenomenon is referred to as:.1. Emotional paradox2. Emotional imbalance3. Habituation4. Narcomania5. Callous unemotionality

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
The united states constitution gives the the power to regulate interstate commerce.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30
Which of the following is an example of how the principle of beneficence can be applied to a study employing human subjects? providing detailed information about the study and obtaining the subject's consent to participate. ensuring that the selection of subjects includes people from all segments of the population. ensuring that persons with diminished autonomy are protected. determining that the study has a maximization of benefits and a minimization of risks.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30
Which of these cities would be found in the most densely populated area on northern section of the map? a) beijing b) seoul c) shanghai d) tokyo
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Psychopaths demonstrate normal appraisal of emotional cues and situations in the abstract (i. e., ve...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 05.05.2020 15:14
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 15:15
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 15:15
Questions on the website: 13722359