subject

Frank Larsen argues for stricter gun control. It appears that Frank wants to abolish access to guns altogether. But if law-abiding citizens can't own a gun, then they will have no means of defending themselves against criminals. Obviously Frank's argument is no good. A. Straw man. B. No fallacy. C. Red herring. D. False cause. E. Argument against the person, abusive.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:00
When something is moving, it is in motion. pressing the gas pedal in a car will put the car in motion. two important properties of motion are speed and direction. speed is how fast an object is moving. tony and tanya both run for the same amount of time, in the same direction. tanya runs much further than tony in that time. how does tony's speed compare to tanya's speed? a) their speed is equal. b) tony is slower than tanya. c) tony is faster than tanya. d) without a stopwatch, you can't say for certain.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
What would happen if people from different races were seperated today
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:00
Any study/memorization tips? i have exams in a week and it would be great to try suggestions!you ; )
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 20:30
If your five-year-old self suddenly found themselves inhabiting your current body, what would your five-year-old self do first?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Frank Larsen argues for stricter gun control. It appears that Frank wants to abolish access to guns...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:00
Questions on the website: 13722361