George Lawler and John Claydon were lawyers who maintained separate law practices in the same office space. They shared the expenses of that space but never shared clients, did not commingle their funds, and did not share profits or losses from their practices. A sign identified the office as "Claydon and Lawler," and the same joint listing of names appeared on sta-tionery they both used and in their telephone listing. Claydon introduced Lawler to his clients as his part-ner. In phone conversations, Lawler identified himself as Claydon’s partner. Is there a risk that Lawler will be liable on contracts and torts made by Claydon?

Yes

Explanation:

There is no tangible connection, between the two lawyers, I mean, there is no tangle connection like ,maybe they attended law school together or maybe they were childhood friends ,what is linking both of the. Is the office . the main reason y they is risk of Lawler will be liable for contracts and torts made by claydon is that they don't share clients ,a time will come when clients will favour one of the other based on performance and one will get jealous and envious of the other before you know it, one will try to win a client over from another and causes conflict , so yes there is a big risk between them in profession.

the median of the data is 4.

step-by-step explanation:

the median means the middle number of a given number.

to decide which one is the median, arrange in ascending or descending order. but sometimes, you may find two(2) number in the middle, but it's easy, just add them together and divide by 2.

so,   determine the median of the data. 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9

it is already arranged, count 3 times forward and 3 backward and the one left is your answer.

2,3,3,4,5,7,9

our answer is 4.

hope this !

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.