What was the result in the Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store Inc. case (referenced in the textbook) involving an advertisement for the sale of fur coats?

the court ruled that the ad was an offer and that the plaintiff properly accepted it.

Explanation:

Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store was an American contract law case that occurred in 1957. In this case the court ruled that the ad was an offer and that the plaintiff properly accepted it. They then enforced the contract because under the applicable standard, it was not apparent that joking was involved in the advertisement of the product.

usually, however, secession was popular enough without the of community leaders. prominent unionists, on the other hand, were a major reason that texas did not secede before march 1861. the most important of these was sam houston, the governor of the state from 1859 to 1861.

can i have brainlest