• Why do the authors point to Levitt (and Smith, and Marshall) as inspirations for using numbers to investigate problems? What does thinking like them offer to analysis of sports?

The author points to Levitt and Smith, as well as Marshll as inspirations for using numbers to investigate problems because:

they made efort to connect their works with real world problems.

Thinking like them offer to sports analysis

That numbers will sometimes disprove conventional wisdom

Explanation:

The studies on sports efficacy under economical and statistical models to obtain a coefficient of price over win is a revolutionary approach to calculate the number of resources a team needs to use to win. This approach has managed to find efficacy in teams as a whole and the contribution of players in the system as an effective system. It has enhanced analysts and researchers the ability to understand when the team can use its resources in its best way. This has left behind conventional wisdom on players and teams to bring statistical approaches and knowledge based on deductions to find efficacy in real-world sports problems.

answer; i believe that the correct answer is ( troxel v. granville);

the question deals with financial planning and the answer is that dan did not stay on budget due to the fact that this guy needs to start decreasing his discretionary spending. according to the financial plan, he needed to balance his expenses and resources.