Josh works for a federal governmental agency that requires drug testing as a condition of employment. He wants to challenge the constitutionality of the testing in court. For his case, Josh will attempt to rely on: a. the Thirteenth Amendment. b. the Second Amendment. c. the Fourth Amendment. d. the Eighth Amendment.

C. The fourth amendment

Explanation:

In two 1989 decisions the Court held that no warrant, probable cause, or even individualized suspicion is required for mandatory drug testing of certain classes of railroad and public employees. In each case, “special needs beyond the normal need for law enforcement” were identified as justifying the drug testing.

this question is confusing, could you reword it?

explanation:

the answer is either c or d i think its d