subject
Social Studies, 27.02.2020 03:09 sadie960

The was a document that restricted the newly created U. S. federal government from levying and collecting taxes, regulating commerce with foreign countries, and regulating interstate commerce.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 13:00
This essay will discuss two speeches perils of indifference by elie wiesel, and on women is right to vote by susan b. anthony. the difference between elie wiesel's speech and susan b. anthony's is lack of equal right where as elie wiesel's is about wwii. the similarities between these two speeches and events are indifference or lack of concern, in both cases these events happened due to lack of concern for both parties. the nation had a lack of concern for those fighting for their lives in europe for many years, as did men about women's right to vote, many did not seem to care that women's rights were not being exercised
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30
What was different about warfare in the early 1800s and early 1900s?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
Read the aphorisms. be slow in choosing a friend, slower in changing. an open foe may prove a curse; but a pretended friend is worse. a true friend is the best possession. according to these aphorisms from benjamin franklin's poor richard's almanack, what might happen if a person is careless in choosing a friend? it is best not to have friends because they will usually betray you. casual friends are often the best and can be more trusted than enemies. a person who has betrayed you can sometimes become a good friend. a friend who is not carefully chosen can be worse than an enemy.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The was a document that restricted the newly created U. S. federal government from levying and coll...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367