subject
Social Studies, 21.02.2020 22:20 ehejndjed

You are a university student, but you also wait tables at a restaurant. One evening, one of yourprofessors happens to come in for a meal (seemingly on a date!). Use role theory to describe the interaction (and possible role conflict) that ensues. This situation "screams" awkward, at least it does for me. As a server myself, sometimesI’ll see the occasional teacher which is sort of weird enough. In the role of student, the professoris sort of held to a high(ish) standard, and as students we seem to forget that these professors alsoplay the role of adult, that they too have social lives. In this sense I believe that the role of "professor" is a Master Role, since as previously stated it sort of trumps all the other rolls that are given to that adult (at least in the eyes of his / her students). In my own personal cases, outside of the classroom environment, teachers assume the role of "adult" and they strip you of the role of "student." I say this because it usually isn’t ever awkward for the teacher if they happen to run into one of their own students.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:00
50 points in at least two paragraphs, discuss the differences between the principles of republicanism and democracy. explain whether you think the united states is more of a republic or a democracy. refer to at least one example from the constitution.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Emma lives on a tight budget. she saves money and also makes intelligent choices when spending it. which statements describe emma's financial skills? select three options.emma is more prepared to meet her basic needs.emma is better prepared to avoid financial setbacks.emma is better able to avoid accumulating assets.emma is more prepared to face emergencies.emma is better able to avoid financial decision-making.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
In what ways did the compromise of 1850 and the kansas-nebraska act of 1854 differ from the missouri compromise? both compromises used the established 36°30′ parallel to determine if territories would become free or slave states. both compromises used the mason-dixon line to determine if the territories would become free or slave states. both compromises let territories use popular sovereignty to determine if they would become free or slave states. both compromises only granted congress the power to determine if territories would become free or slave states.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
What is a capital crime? its not social studies but they don't have criminal justice
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
You are a university student, but you also wait tables at a restaurant. One evening, one of yourprof...
Questions
question
History, 06.01.2021 21:00
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 21:00
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 21:00
question
Physics, 06.01.2021 21:10
question
Chemistry, 06.01.2021 21:10
Questions on the website: 13722363