subject
Social Studies, 21.02.2020 05:27 kie1148

A child swallowed a small part from a toy and is injured as a result. The child was three year old, and the toy was made for children 10 and up. The box clearly stated that the toy was made for children 10-years old and up and also had warnings about how parents should always supervise their children when playing with the toy. The box also said the product was not to be swallowed. In this case, the child's parent was not supervising the three year old when he swallowed the toy part. As a result, the jury determines that the toy manufacturer (defendant) was 20% liable, but the majority of the liability rests with the parent who did not supervise the child. Under which system of negligence can the plaintiff recover damages for the 20% liability of the company? a) Strict liability Assumption of the risk b) Modified comparative negligence c) Pure comparative negligence d) Contributory negligence

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:40
What film is responsible for the creation of the pg-13 rating?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00
The document asks about dependents because the number can affect who pays taxes. increase overall taxes. lower overall taxes. affect when to pay taxes.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00
Should the city pass a ban on skateboarders on all public property, or are the citizens who oppose the ban right when they argue that there are benefits to having the skateboarders in public parks? plan and write a response in which you state your position and persuade readers to agree with you. support your position with reasons and examples drawn from the proposed amendment to ban skateboarding and from information in the letters to the editor, as well as from your own experience.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30
Hegyes was driving her car when it was negligently struck by a unjian enterprises truck. she was injured, and an implant was placed in her body to counteract the injuries. she sued unjian, and the case was settled. two years later hegyes became pregnant. the growing fetus pressed against the implant, making it necessary for her doctor to deliver the child 51 days prematurely by cesarean section. because of its premature birth, the child had a breathing handicap. suit was brought against unjian enterprises for the harm sustained by the child. was the defendant liable?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A child swallowed a small part from a toy and is injured as a result. The child was three year old,...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.08.2022 18:50
question
Mathematics, 12.08.2022 22:10
question
Mathematics, 13.08.2022 09:00
Questions on the website: 13722362