An officer is sent to investigate a disturbance. At the home, he discovers a man in the garage with a severe, life-ending trauma to the head. An ambulance arrives shortly after. Both the officer and the EMTs agree that the victim is obviously deceased. The EMTs insist on transporting the body to the ER immediately.
What should the officer do in this situation?
A. The officer should not authorize the removal of the body until after the crime scene has been processed.
B. The officer should allow the transfer of the deceased but should accompany the body to maintain the chain of custody.
C. The officer should photograph the body first, then allow the EMTs to transport the deceased to the hospital.
D. The officer should cover the body first, then wrap the hands in bags, and only then allow the body to be transported.

Option B

Explanation:

On no account the officer leaves site of the body. In this situation the best possible person that can explain what happened, is the victim, the EMT has given a chance that the body is alive, a better opportunity for the officer to hear from the horse mouth, the officer should allow the transport of the body buy should not lose site of the body.

these are the choices

local priests

european monarchs

common people

bible translators

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.