subject
Social Studies, 20.02.2020 19:59 jadejordan8888

The leader of a political party says a rival political party is "irresponsible because they are destroying the livelihood of millions of Southwestern ranchers with their policies." An economist not affiliated with any political party cites data saying that the same ranchers "have sustained a 5 percent increase in taxes when purchasing feed." Which statement best describes how the two statements compare?a. Both statements use emotive language. b. Both statements are most likely facts. c. The first statement is more likely uses evasive language and the second is more likely emotive language. d. The first statement is more likely uses emotive language and the second is more likely a fact. e. Both statements use evasive language.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30
What decision were made by the first congress during its first year that shape the future of the government
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30
Give a brief summary/define the holocaust - who was behind it, how it began, what was the goal, and where did it take place? (8-10 sentences). be sure to include at least 2 pictures or a timeline
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
Many of the mauryan empire’s huge pillars originally were transported from quarries in india. a. central b. eastern c. southern d. western
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30
What was governor faubus’s public stance on integration of central high school?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The leader of a political party says a rival political party is "irresponsible because they are dest...
Questions
question
Biology, 31.07.2020 21:01
question
Mathematics, 31.07.2020 21:01
question
Mathematics, 31.07.2020 21:01
Questions on the website: 13722367