After Suzi's purse got stolen, the police asked her to look at mug shots to try to identify the perpetrator. After looking at several images, Suzi felt that they became blurred together in her mind—she no longer felt confident that she would be able to identify the man who stole her purse. In fact, she could no longer recall whether he had a moustache or not. The suggestibility of memory raises serious questions about using for courtroom evidence.

Eyewitness Testimony.

Explanation:

The term eyewitness testimony is a legal term that is used for the people who give an account of a certain event witnessed by them. This person can be the bystander or the victim himself. The account given by the eyewitness is usually descriptive. The person is required to describe the event in detail of how it started and what happened afterward. Eyewitness testimony includes crime details, perpetrator's identification, etc.

In the given context, the testimony of eyewitness is questionable because Suzi is not able to memorize the face of the perpetrator.

So, the correct answer is eyewitness testimony.

true

the correct answer is "c": the pillars proclaimed his regret at the bloodshed at the battle of kalinga and his conversion to buddhism.

the kalinga war is considered as one of the largest battles in the history of india. it was fought between the between the maurya empire, which ruled the lands of what is now known as india at the time, and the independent feudal kingdom of kalinga.

the army of maurya empire, led by its king ashoka, fought a prolonged war against kalinga. the war ended around 262 bce with the victory of the maurya empire. it is believed that ashoka, after having witnessed the loss of many lives during this war, felt deep responsibility and eventually converted into buddhism.