According to Sumner, the mores of a group define what is good and bad. What might be an example of a more that is bad in itself? Would Sumner agree that such a thing is possible?

The example ofa more that is bad in itself is "SLAVERY".

Sumner will accept this because he believes in "LAISSEZ-FAIRE THEORY".

Explanation:

William Graham Sumner defined mores to be a social norms that are widely seen within a particular society or culture. The mores of a group is used to determine an acceptable and unacceptable actions within such group.

Sumner believes in LAISSEZ-FAIRE THEORY, which states that people should be given the chance to live a free live, without any government or political interference. Since he is a freedom speaker, that means he is against slavery, and will believe that slavery is bad in itself, and should be a general bad more among all societies and nation's.

both the house and senate must approve the conference report.   after it is approved by both on an identical from, it will be sent to the president.   if the president approves it, it will become law.

chavez's example shows that nonviolent protest can work well. it shows that one nonviolent man can stop a mob, which proves chavez's point and persuades people to protest nonviolently.